(1) The College Higher Education Assessment Review Panel is established under the Learning, Teaching and Assessment Committee Terms of Reference. (2) Each College shall establish a College Higher Education Assessment Review Panel. (3) By agreement, Colleges which have have a limited involvement in Higher Education undergraduate or postgraduate coursework provision may have responsibilities relating to the finalisation of assessment included within the College Higher Education Assessment Review Panel of another College. (4) The College Higher Education Assessment Review Panel shall: (5) The membership of the College Higher Education Assessment Review Panel shall comprise the following: (6) The Chair of the College Higher Education Assessment Review Panel will be the relevant College Dean. In the Chair’s absence, the Associate Dean Learning and Teaching will preside over the meeting. (7) Administrative support will be provided by the relevant College Administration. (8) The College Higher Education Assessment Review Panel meetings must be scheduled to ensure the timely publication of results to students, including at the end of all major teaching periods as described by the Higher Education Academic Calendar. (9) This Committee must provide a report in a timely manner to the next meeting of the relevant College Learning and Teaching Committee and the University Learning, Teaching and Assessment Committee. (10) Where a member has an actual, potential or perceived conflict of interest regarding an agenda item, they must declare this to the Chair at the commencement of discussion of the item, and be prepared to excuse themselves from the discussion, or the room, if required, as per the terms of the Conflicts of Interest Policy. (11) Non-compliance with Governance Documents is considered a breach of the Code of Conduct – Staff or the Code of Conduct – Students, as applicable, and is treated seriously by the University. Reports of concerns about non-compliance will be managed in accordance with the applicable disciplinary procedures outlined in the Charles Darwin University and Union Enterprise Agreement 2022 and the Code of Conduct – Students. (12) Complaints may be raised in accordance with the Code of Conduct – Staff and Code of Conduct - Students. (13) All staff members have an individual responsibility to raise any suspicion, allegation or report of fraud or corruption in accordance with the Fraud and Corruption Control Policy and Whistleblower Reporting (Improper Conduct) Procedure.College Higher Education Assessment Review Panel Terms of Reference
Section 1 - ESTABLISHMENT
Section 2 - FUNCTIONS AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Top of Page
Note: Grade distribution reports should provide explanations for variations in grade distributions from the above parameters.
Section 3 - MEMBERSHIP
Top of PageSection 4 - CHAIR
Section 5 - SECRETARY
Section 6 - MEETINGS
Section 7 - REPORTING
Section 8 - CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Section 9 - NON-COMPLIANCE
View Current
This is not a current document. To view the current version, click the link in the document's navigation bar.